| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Ravindran G - TLS, Chennai(dot)" <ravindran_g(at)hcl(dot)in>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql - Threshold value. |
| Date: | 2006-12-11 16:09:18 |
| Message-ID: | 12806.1165853358@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/11/06, Ravindran G - TLS, Chennai. <ravindran_g(at)hcl(dot)in> wrote:
>> I am using Postgres 8.1.4 in windows 2000 and i don't get the proper
>> response for threshold.
> what is the response you get ? please be specific about the issues.
Even more to the point, what sort of response do you think you should
get? What kind of threshold are you talking about, and why do you think
it even exists in Postgres?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jens Schipkowski | 2006-12-11 16:19:27 | really quick multiple inserts can use COPY? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-11 15:59:00 | Re: Low throughput of binary inserts from windows to linux |