| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On Scalability |
| Date: | 2010-07-29 18:16:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1280427410.8613.44.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:52 +0200, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> 2010/7/29 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:34 +0200, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> >
> >> I expect that a more complex schema will imply higher workloads
> >> on the query planner. What I don't know is how the increase in the
> >> workload will happen: linearly, sublinearly, polynomially or what?
>
> Do you think I should ask somewhere else?
> Any hint?
The two people that would likely know the best are on vacation, TGL and
Heikki. You may have to wait a bit.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-29 18:35:12 | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
| Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-07-29 17:52:12 | Re: On Scalability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-07-29 20:09:47 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-07-29 17:52:12 | Re: On Scalability |