Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().
Date: 2010-07-09 18:17:36
Message-ID: 1278699456.29736.1039.camel@ebony (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Except that it *is* a change in behavior: the first check will occur
> >> too soon.
> > Sooner matters why?
> Consider PREPARE followed only later by EXECUTE.  Your proposal would
> make the PREPARE fail outright, when it currently does not.

Just to avoid wasted investigation: are you saying that is important
behaviour that is essential we retain in PostgreSQL, or will you hear
evidence that supporting that leads to a performance decrease elsewhere?

 Simon Riggs 
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-07-09 18:49:50
Subject: Re: WIP patch for serializable transactions with predicate locking
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-07-09 18:03:54
Subject: Re: FYI: Ubuntu 10.04 lucid strange segfault

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-09 21:11:48
Subject: pgsql: Fix ruleutils' get_variable() to print something useful for Vars
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-09 18:01:11
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group