Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().
Date: 2010-07-09 18:17:36
Message-ID: 1278699456.29736.1039.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Except that it *is* a change in behavior: the first check will occur
> >> too soon.
>
> > Sooner matters why?
>
> Consider PREPARE followed only later by EXECUTE. Your proposal would
> make the PREPARE fail outright, when it currently does not.

Just to avoid wasted investigation: are you saying that is important
behaviour that is essential we retain in PostgreSQL, or will you hear
evidence that supporting that leads to a performance decrease elsewhere?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-07-09 21:11:48 pgsql: Fix ruleutils' get_variable() to print something useful for Vars
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-07-09 18:01:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-07-09 18:49:50 Re: WIP patch for serializable transactions with predicate locking
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-07-09 18:03:54 Re: FYI: Ubuntu 10.04 lucid strange segfault