Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement
Date: 2010-06-19 15:56:57
Message-ID: 1276963017.5130.6.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 13:34 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:42, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release
> >> > of version 9.0. "
> >> >
> >> > Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
> >>
> >> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive. You don't think so?
> >
> > O.k. this may not fly but:
> >
> > The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (that is who we are, not team)
> > is proud to announce the release of 9.
>
> Can we please *not* call it 9, but stick to 9.0?
>
> We have enough people talking about PostgreSQL 7 and PostgreSQL 8 not
> knowing that 8.0 and 8.4 are quite significantly different products
> already. We don't need to encourage *more* of that.

Hmpf you are right. I didn't think about that aspect.

Joshua D. Drake

>
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-06-20 20:21:10 Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-06-19 11:34:37 Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement