| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |
| Date: | 2010-06-09 22:52:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1276123951.23257.1114.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 18:18 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Are you planning to work on these things now as you said?
>
> > Are you? Or do you want me to?
>
> I decided there wasn't time to get anything useful done on it before the
> beta2 deadline (which is, more or less, right now). I will take another
> look over the next few days.
Esteemed colleague Tom,
We all really need you to fix up max_standby_delay, or, let me do it.
It appears we both agree that more testing would be beneficial. The only
way we are going to get that is by finishing this off and declaring a
new HS-beta.
Please let me know how you wish to proceed. (No answer means I do it.)
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-06-09 23:05:59 | Bug or feature? Timestamp parsing |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-06-09 22:42:43 | Re: failover vs. read only queries |