| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Londiste |
| Date: | 2010-05-25 20:57:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1274821038.6203.2828.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:23 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > Can anyone suggest where a "Londiste" mention would fit in our high
> > availability docs?
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/high-availability.html
>
> We already have Slony there as an "example of" async master-slave. Is
> there some problem you are trying to fix? It would be hard to add this
> without opening the floodgates of mentioning all replication systems.
Don't see a problem with mentioning Londiste.
It's not like there's that many production-strength candidates that we
shouldn't mention them all. Right now, I see it as the only missing one
on the list.
BTW Bruce, "log shipping" isn't mentioned at all in that section, which
is strange since that's what's in 9.0.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-26 19:56:45 | Re: Londiste |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-25 18:15:07 | Re: Londiste |