| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE SCHEMA ... CREATE DOMAIN support |
| Date: | 2024-12-01 05:53:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1273964.1733032384@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 3) Why do we delete this in `create_schema.sgml`? Is this untrue? It
> is about order of definition, not creation, isn't it?
>> - The SQL standard specifies that the subcommands in <command>CREATE
>> - SCHEMA</command> can appear in any order.
In context with the following sentence, what that is really trying
to say is that the spec requires us to re-order the subcommands
to eliminate forward references. After studying the text I cannot
find any such statement. Maybe I missed something --- there's a
lot of text --- but it's sure not to be detected in any obvious
place like 11.1 <schema definition>.
(I'd be curious to know how other major implementations handle
this. Are we the only implementation that ever read the spec
that way?)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2024-12-01 09:59:08 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA ... CREATE DOMAIN support |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-12-01 05:39:20 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA ... CREATE DOMAIN support |