Re: "supplementary storage table"?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "supplementary storage table"?
Date: 2010-05-13 15:44:20
Message-ID: 1273765415-sup-7831@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue may 13 11:08:23 -0400 2010:
> Okay, who decided $SUBJECT was a good locution for "toast table"?
> I find two or three usages of that in the CREATE/ALTER TABLE reference
> pages, without definition. Everywhere else it's "toast table".
> We do not need people deciding to invent their own terminology for
> the docs.

I think I used it somewhere, assuming the original wording I saw already
on the docs was accepted terminology.
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-05-13 16:09:34 Re: "supplementary storage table"?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-13 15:26:39 Re: "supplementary storage table"?