Re: snprintf improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snprintf improvements
Date: 2005-03-02 19:18:40
Message-ID: 12735.1109791120@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled,

I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved,
only complicate the configuration behavior even more.

> I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf.

I consider this an awful idea as well.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-03-02 19:35:12 Re: snprintf improvements
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-03-02 18:29:01 Re: [BUGS] typos in the docu