Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update Optimization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update Optimization
Date: 2006-11-09 23:17:33
Message-ID: 12734.1163114253@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ...and of course it would be good if LISTEN/NOTIFY were able to use this
> concept also, to help Slony along also.

LISTEN/NOTIFY are overdue to be rewritten to not use a table at all,
so I'm not particularly worried about whether this idea is applicable
to them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-09 23:28:37 Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview of HOT Updates
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-09 22:44:57 Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview of HOTUpdates