Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH versus rpath

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
Subject: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH versus rpath
Date: 2010-05-06 10:25:12
Message-ID: 1273141512.17372.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2010-05-06 at 11:20 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> We only set RPATH if the install location isn't part of the default ld
> library path specified by /etc/ld.so.conf right?

No. How would you determine that?

> Setting it if it is
> in the default path would be antisocial.

That's why there is --disable-rpath.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2010-05-06 10:37:42 Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-05-06 10:24:26 Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH versus rpath