Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?

From: Peter Sabaini <peter(dot)sabaini(at)ait(dot)ac(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Date: 2010-05-04 19:41:21
Message-ID: 1273002081.2590.7.camel@w-ehs-psa.telbiomed.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Sabaini <peter(dot)sabaini(at)ait(dot)ac(dot)at> writes:
> > it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to
> > communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict
> > packet filter rules in place, and I'd like to make the system use a
> > fixed port for this, or even better a Unix domain socket. Is this
> > possible (setting a compile time or run time parameter)?
>
> No, the stats collector just uses whatever port bind() chooses for it.

A pity.

> I'd suggest backing off your ideas about how much filtering is
> appropriate for local connections.

Since we're running multiple database instances with different projects
on one machine I'd like to isolate them as best I can.

Thanks anyway...

peter.

>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-05-04 20:04:38 Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Previous Message Bob Lunney 2010-05-04 16:09:22 Re: Runaway Locks