From: | Peter Sabaini <peter(dot)sabaini(at)ait(dot)ac(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket? |
Date: | 2010-05-04 19:41:21 |
Message-ID: | 1273002081.2590.7.camel@w-ehs-psa.telbiomed.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Sabaini <peter(dot)sabaini(at)ait(dot)ac(dot)at> writes:
> > it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to
> > communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict
> > packet filter rules in place, and I'd like to make the system use a
> > fixed port for this, or even better a Unix domain socket. Is this
> > possible (setting a compile time or run time parameter)?
>
> No, the stats collector just uses whatever port bind() chooses for it.
A pity.
> I'd suggest backing off your ideas about how much filtering is
> appropriate for local connections.
Since we're running multiple database instances with different projects
on one machine I'd like to isolate them as best I can.
Thanks anyway...
peter.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-05-04 20:04:38 | Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket? |
Previous Message | Bob Lunney | 2010-05-04 16:09:22 | Re: Runaway Locks |