Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Date: 2010-05-01 17:36:04
Message-ID: 1272735364.4161.24251.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Where is this test procedure documented?
>
> > In src/test/regress/standby_schedule
>
> That's a good way to ensure nobody knows it's there :-(
>
> If you want users to run this, document it in cookbook fashion in
> doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml

OK

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matteo Beccati 2010-05-01 18:16:13 Mailing list archives (was Re: [HACKERS] mailing list archiver chewing patches)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-01 17:12:40 Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby