On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like
> >> its been through Google translate.
> > Because it's not a maximum?
> Indeed. It would really be more like min_wal_segments, if we wanted to
> name it that way.
Yeh, agreed: min_wal_segments. I realised while having dinner it was the
opposite, so I'm pleased everybody else got there at same time.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-04-30 19:11:44|
|Subject: Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS]
pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-04-30 18:54:41|
|Subject: Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |