| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Date: | 2010-04-30 06:40:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1272609608.6148.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2010-04-29 at 17:34 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I talked to a few people personally about this, and it seems there was a
> misunderstanding. I was not asking if pg_migrator should be in 9.0
> beta1. I was asking if we should think about putting it into a later
> 9.0 beta, like 9.0 beta3. It would be another major 9.0 feature.
If it's supposed to be a major feature, then it should be in src/bin,
and fully integrated in the install, the documentation, etc.
If you want to put it in contrib because the standards are more lax
there, then by definition it's not really a major feature, it's just a
random feature that was snuck in. You can't have it both ways.
My personal feeling is that pg_migrator should be fully integrated, but
it's too late for that, obviously. Let's do it for 9.1.
I also think that the standards for contrib should not be so lax that a
completely new module can be added after beta. (This is mostly informed
by the feeling that contrib should go away entirely.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Bailey | 2010-04-30 07:33:20 | Invalidating dependent views and functions |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-30 06:35:20 | Re: failed assertion and panic in standby mode |