| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
| Date: | 2010-04-23 19:38:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1272051490.4161.799.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> We're going to need
> a bunch of GUCs any way we slice it. The issue is whether there's a
> way to slice it that involves fewer AND and OR operators that have to
> be understood by users.
So we're proposing adding parameters to simplify things for users? I
don't think fiddling is going to improve things significantly from a
usability perspective, especially at the last minute.
I'm guessing this conversation has more to do with the situation that
some very clever people have a little time on their hands after a long
period of hard work. I see no problem that needs to be solved, not
alongside this water cooler at least. Smells like beta time.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-04-23 19:56:17 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-23 19:34:59 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |