| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
| Date: | 2010-04-23 18:55:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1272048948.4161.781.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:45 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Archiving and streaming replication are
> just two means of transporting WAL records from point A to point B.
> By definition, any two manners of moving a byte stream around are
> isomorphic and can't possibly affect what that byte stream does or
> does not need to contain.
It is currently true, but there is no benefit in us constraining future
implementation routes without good reason.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-23 19:05:06 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-04-23 18:43:47 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |