Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date: 2007-11-14 03:28:11
Message-ID: 12705.1195010891@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
>> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
>>
>> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
>> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
>> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
>> Thoughts?

> There are some references in the main docs too last I checked. I can
> submit a patch in the next day.

I think I already got everything except the items mentioned above.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-14 03:40:24 Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-14 03:17:04 Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation