| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |
| Date: | 2003-07-04 03:52:09 |
| Message-ID: | 12705.1057290729@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Sean Asks:
>> What are the odds of going through and revamping some of the tunables
>> in postgresql.conf for the 7.4 release?
> Poor. The time to do this would have been 3 weeks ago, when I
> announced that I was re-organizing them and that Bruce was changing
> many names. We're past Feature Freeze now, and we have a *lot* of
> bug-checking to do with the back-end changes.
FWIW, I think what Sean is suggesting would amount purely to a
documentation change, and as such would be perfectly legitimate during
beta. However, I quite agree with your point that we are far from
having a consensus on good numbers to put in. To get to consensus will
take a lot more work on benchmarking than we've done to date.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rafal Kedziorski | 2003-07-04 10:03:03 | PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 03:13:11 | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |