| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby and DROP DATABASE |
| Date: | 2010-02-07 16:49:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1265561344.27207.35.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 17:32 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > So it seems at least the behavior is quite different from what the
> > docs stats. Am I missing something here?
> Its a small bug/typo in standby.c:ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase
>
> The line:
> CancelDBBackends(dbid, PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_TABLESPACE, true);
>
> has to be
> CancelDBBackends(dbid, PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_DATABASE, true);
Well spotted, thanks for the report and the analysis.
The code for drop database worked when committed but it looks like the
re-factoring of the code broke it. Will fix.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-07 16:58:44 | Re: pg_class has no toast table? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-07 16:44:38 | Re: Precedence of Postfix operators |