Re: psql's \d and \dt are sending their complaints to different output files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql's \d and \dt are sending their complaints to different output files
Date: 2017-06-19 21:53:48
Message-ID: 12653.1497909228@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The docs also indicate that we don't include materialized views as
> part of "\d" which seems like an oversight somewhere.

Where are you reading that? Experimentation shows that "\d" does include
matviews, and that matches the code, which has this as the default
expansion of \d:

/* standard listing of interesting things */
success = listTables("tvmsE", NULL, show_verbose, show_system);

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Rofail 2017-06-19 22:02:37 Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-06-19 21:43:34 Re: psql's \d and \dt are sending their complaints to different output files