| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, James William Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpython3 |
| Date: | 2010-02-01 21:39:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1265060352.10100.189.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > I would love to know why PL/Python can't be incrementally improved like
> > > the rest of our code.
> >
> > It has been. That is exactly what PeterE has been doing.
> >
> > However, if you look at this whole thread, you will see the James has a
> > very different view of the implementation. One that at least appears to
> > be more advanced and "pythonic" than our version.
>
> More "pythonic" in its internal processing or in its user interface?
User interface and also internal processing (see the types discussion).
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-02-01 21:43:56 | Re: plpython3 |
| Previous Message | James William Pye | 2010-02-01 21:38:48 | Re: plpython3 |