Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-02-01 19:40:02
Message-ID: 1265053202.13782.12964.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:01 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:

> Putting it back takes time and
> given enough of that rare cloth, it will eventually be put back.

Looks like I'll have time to add the starts-at-shutdown-checkpoint item
back in after all.

I'd appreciate it if you could review the relation-specific conflict
patch, 'cos it's still important.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Boley 2010-02-01 20:01:28 Re: plpython3
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-01 19:29:17 Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns