| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution |
| Date: | 2010-01-29 16:42:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1264783323.24669.17741.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:52 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> You said "I think we should extend the time available to make sure we
> have a sensible set of features for 9.0." Perhaps part of the problem
> is that I couldn't understand what your patch did from the description
> you posted and can't evaluate whether it's fixing a problem that makes
> the current feature set incoherent. Can you explain what it does in
> more detail so we can understand why it's necessary for a sensible set
> of features?
I'll break down the patch into two pieces to make it easier to review,
and add more description, as you suggest.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-01-29 16:48:56 | NaN/Inf fix for ECPG Re: out-of-scope cursor errors |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2010-01-29 16:38:10 | Strange heuristic in analyze.c |