On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a
> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send
> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.
Is that something you're working on?
Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-01-17 21:53:47|
|Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-17 21:42:39|
|Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS |