| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior |
| Date: | 2010-01-12 23:07:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1263337673.26654.593.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 19:43 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 January 2010 09:40:03 Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 06:30 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Currently the patch does not yet do anything to avoid letting the
> > > protocol out of sync. What do you think about adding a flag for error
> > > codes not to communicate with the client (Similarly to COMERROR)?
> > >
> > > So that one could do an elog(ERROR & ERROR_NO_SEND_CLIENT, .. or such?
> > Seems fairly important piece.
> Do you aggree on the approach then? Do you want to do it?
If you would like to prototype something on this issue it would be
gratefully received. I will review when submitted, though I may need
other review also.
I'm still reworking other code, so things might change under you, though
not deliberately so. I will post as soon as I can, which isn't yet.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-12 23:08:32 | Any ExecStoreTuple end runs? |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2010-01-12 23:07:13 | patch to implement ECPG side tracing / tracking ... |