| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema vs Namespace |
| Date: | 2002-09-22 17:05:40 |
| Message-ID: | 12632.1032714340@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> What's the strategy for naming things schema or namespace? In notice that
> pg_dump messages are all about namespaces. That seems confusing from a
> user's viewpoint.
Probably the user-visible messages should all mention schemas.
I named the catalog pg_namespace because I didn't want to nail down
a presumption that the things in it are exactly equivalent to SQL
schemas; namespaces are an implementation mechanism to support schemas,
but not necessarily an equivalent concept. But this bit of
implementation philosophy isn't very relevant for users.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-09-22 17:08:00 | Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-22 16:56:23 | Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance |