Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network
Date: 2010-01-07 21:59:13
Message-ID: 1262901553.9754.1.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:22 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Dave,

> What I'm getting from your e-mail, Dave, is "If it doesn't solve all
> problems for everyone in the world from Day 1, it's not worth doing."

I doubt that is Dave's intent because then we might as well stop work on
PostgreSQL too.

> David's proposal is designed to be something which he can get done *this
> year*, possibly before 8.5 is released, and be built on later. It'll be
> useful to a substantial number of our users, and will be an improvement
> on what we have now.
>

I say if Wheeler wants to do it, he should do it and stop quibbling with
the rudiments of the Org opinion. Guess how many people have opinions?

Buildfarm succeeded because someone stepped up, evaluated, took a little
feedback and ran with it. He didn't screw around waiting for everyone to
be happy.

So +1 on Wheeler's idea.

Joshua D. Drake

> --Josh Berkus
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2010-01-07 21:59:41 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Previous Message Robert Treat 2010-01-07 21:56:44 Re: 8.5alpha3 hot standby crash report (DatabasePath related?)