From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What's the current theory about derived files in VPATH builds? |
Date: | 2010-01-04 23:57:24 |
Message-ID: | 1262649444.13313.123.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On mån, 2010-01-04 at 18:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It seems like VPATH building is broken at the moment, at least if you
> are working from a maintainer-clean source tree.
>
> make -C bootstrap all
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/build/src/backend/bootstrap'
> /usr/local/bin/bison -o bootparse.c /home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/bootstrap/bootparse.y
> /usr/local/bin/flex -o'bootscanner.c' /home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/bootstrap/bootscanner.l
> gcc -O1 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing -g -I/home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/bootstrap -I../../../src/include -I/home/postgres/pgsql/src/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -c -o bootparse.o bootparse.c
> /home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/bootstrap/bootparse.y:401: bootscanner.c: No such file or directory
> make[3]: *** [bootparse.o] Error 1
>
> I thought the current plan was that derived files should be generated in
> the build tree (as indeed it seems to be doing) ... but there are
> apparently parts of the Makefiles that are not in sync with this plan.
> Has this just not been tested recently, or am I confused?
This should in principle work. My guess is an old make version being
confused.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-05 00:05:51 | Re: What's the current theory about derived files in VPATH builds? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-04 23:49:37 | What's the current theory about derived files in VPATH builds? |