From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fix old confusing JSON example |
Date: | 2021-04-20 19:07:52 |
Message-ID: | 1262514661.622692.1618945673016@webmailclassic.xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
> On 2021.04.16. 10:00 Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:28:38PM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > So, that gives information on two operators, and then gives one
> > example query for each. Clearly, the second example was meant to
> > illustrate a where-clause with the @? operator.
> >
> > Small change to prevent great confusion (I'll admit it took me far
> > too long to understand this).
>
> Once one guesses the definition of the table to use with the sample
> data at disposal in the docs, it is easy to see that both queries
> should return the same result, but the second one misses the shot and
> is corrected as you say. So, applied.
Great, thank you.
I just happened to use the website-documentation and noticed that there the change is not done: it still has the erroneous line, in the docs of 13 (current), and 12; the docs of 14devel are apparently updated.
That makes me wonder: is there a regular html-docs-update (dayly? weekly?) of doc-bugs of this kind in the website-docs of current and earlier releases?
To be clear, I am talking about the lines below:
'GIN index supports @@ and @? operators'
on pages
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-json.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/datatype-json.html
where the change that was pushed was to correct the second example from @@ to @?
thanks,
Erik Rijkers
>
> My apologies for the delay.
> --
> Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-04-20 19:44:28 | Re: fix old confusing JSON example |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-04-20 16:58:10 | pgsql: Fix interaction of log_line_prefix's query_id and log_statement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-04-20 19:44:28 | Re: fix old confusing JSON example |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-04-20 13:17:09 | Re: regarding stored procedure |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-04-20 19:24:29 | Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-04-20 19:04:59 | Re: when the startup process doesn't |