Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed?
Date: 2009-12-29 10:42:00
Message-ID: 1262083320.19367.1998.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:17 +0900, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I have enough items emerging from HS to keep me busy much longer than I
> > thought. I'll run with VF if that's OK, since I have some other related
> > changes in that area and it makes sense to understand that code also, if
> > OK with you.
> Sure. Many users want to see HS.
> BTW, New VACUUM FULL patch is waiting for being applied.
> But I heard HS is attempting to modify VFI in another way or remove it
> completely. Do we still need the patch, or reject it and fix VFI in HS?

HS has two options: (1) move forwards alongside this patch, or (2) make
a separate fix for VFI in HS.

We still want to apply this patch, but I feel it needs changes as
discussed downthread as part of my review. Will it be possible for you
to make those changes and resubmit for next commitfest, or earlier?

Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-12-29 10:48:10 Re: [HACKERS] Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-29 10:31:24 Re: Stats for inheritance trees