| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fast or immediate shutdown |
| Date: | 2009-12-16 15:04:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1260975872.13654.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2009-12-15 at 17:19 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> running with log_checkpoints = on
>
> pg_ctl -D foo -m fast stop
>
> log says
>
> LOG: received fast shutdown request
> LOG: aborting any active transactions
> LOG: shutting down
> LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate
>
> Some of us know that the "immediate" word refers to the restartpoint
> request, though that word causes conceptual conflict with the shutdown
> mode, which was fast, not immediate.
>
> Think we need to change the wording of this
>
> LOG: restartpoint starting: shutdown immediate
>
> so it is clearer what we mean
We *do* we mean? And why are we logging it?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-16 15:10:30 | Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-16 15:02:05 | Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |