Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-02 19:57:04
Message-ID: 1259783824.31757.8.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:45 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> If some people want it, and there's no significant maintenance burden
> associated with YAML output, then why not?
>
> Mind you, if it was practical, I'd suggest that YAML ... and all
> additional Explain formats ... should be a contrib module. Anything
> other than XML and JSON will be fairly marginal.

That would be my take... have explain kick out XML (or whatever) and
then parse it into anything you want. That way it isn't additional
burden into core.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> --Josh Berkus
>
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Caleb Welton 2009-12-02 19:59:54 Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-12-02 19:53:56 Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?