On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 13:20 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > The hard core reality is this. *IF* it is one of the goals of this
> > project to insure that the software can be safely, effectively, and
> > responsibly operated in a manner that is acceptable to C* level people
> > in a Fortune level company then we *must* solve this problem.
> > If it is not the goal of the project, leave it to EDB/CMD/2ndQuandrant
> > to fork it because it will eventually happen. Our customers are
> > demanding these features.
> OK, and when you fork it, how do you plan to implement it?
Hey man, I am not an engineer :P. You know that. I am just speaking the
pressures that some of us are having in the marketplace about these
types of features.
> red judgment on whether this is a feasible solution.
> Does $COMPETITOR offer this feature?
My understanding is that MSSQL does. I am not sure about Oracle. Those
are the only two I run into (I don't run into MySQL at all). I know
others likely compete in the DB2 space.
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-12-01 18:33:28|
|Subject: Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4? |
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-12-01 18:26:50|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby remaining issues|