From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <dfarina(at)truviso(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |
Date: | 2009-11-25 07:09:23 |
Message-ID: | 1259132963.19289.166.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 07:31 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > My disagreement with the row-by-row approach is more semantics than
> > performance. COPY translates records to bytes and vice-versa, and your
> > original patch maintains those semantics.
>
> uff, really
>
> COPY CSV ?
CSV is like text or binary: just another format to _represent_ records
as a sequence of bytes. A CSV file is not a set of postgresql records
until COPY interprets it as such.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-11-25 07:15:15 | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-11-25 07:03:45 | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION |