Re: Hot standby and removing VACUUM FULL

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby and removing VACUUM FULL
Date: 2009-11-25 01:22:15
Message-ID: 1259112135.27757.11155.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 20:20 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> That causes some headaches for Hot Standby

I say leave HS as it is and we can clean up when we do the VFectomy.

It isn't really a headache, the code works easily enough. I agree its
ugly and it should eventually be removed.

Let's not make this any harder, or get involved with promises that we
may not be able to keep. I'd rather we had HS + SR than HS - VF for
example. VF is ugly but it isn't a priority.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-25 01:24:09 Re: Hot standby and removing VACUUM FULL
Previous Message Hitoshi Harada 2009-11-25 01:03:11 Re: Syntax conflicts in frame clause