Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> I see the latest being formally rejected down in the Executor. So
> something is better than in the beta, but the plan being generated is
> not quite right apparently.
No sign of a problem here (using current sources). Exactly which of
Ed's versions did you see a problem with, and what did you see exactly?
regards, tom lane