Re: User mapping security

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User mapping security
Date: 2023-11-09 22:03:33
Message-ID: 1258588.1699567413@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 02:01:00AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> I suppose it should be warned on the pages that foreign credentials with be
>> stored as simple text and will be available for viewing in pg_user_mappings.

> I know this is four years old, but the attached patch documents it. I
> don't think postgresql-fdw needs it since it relies on user mapping and
> discourages passwords in the connection string.

This is far too alarmist. It ignores the privilege restrictions that
are built into the pg_user_mappings view. Random users can't see
umoptions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-09 22:09:55 Re: User mapping security
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-11-09 22:02:53 Re: User mapping security