Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Date: 2009-11-18 09:11:59
Message-ID: 1258535519.3497.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2009-11-18 at 12:52 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > Together, that should cover a lot of cases. Not perfect, but far from
> > useless.
>
> For Japanese users on Windows, the client encoding are always set to SJIS
> because of the restriction of cmd.exe. But the script file can be written
> in UTF8 with BOM. I don't think we should depend on client encoding.

Set by whom, how, and because of what restriction?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-18 09:18:22 Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2009-11-18 09:11:19 Re: Very bad FTS performance with the Polish config