| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSD + RAID |
| Date: | 2009-11-17 17:30:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1258479013.10724.32.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On tis, 2009-11-17 at 11:36 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I am right now talking to someone on postgresql irc who is measuring
> 15k iops from x25-e and no data loss following power plug test. I am
> becoming increasingly suspicious that peter's results are not
> representative: given that 90% of bonnie++ seeks are read only, the
> math doesn't add up, and they contradict broadly published tests on
> the internet. Has anybody independently verified the results?
Notably, between my two blog posts and this email thread, there have
been claims of
400
1800
4000
7000
14000
15000
35000
iops (of some kind) per second.
That alone should be cause of concern.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-11-17 18:51:13 | Re: SSD + RAID |
| Previous Message | Brad Nicholson | 2009-11-17 17:10:18 | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |