| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: next CommitFest |
| Date: | 2009-11-16 17:17:55 |
| Message-ID: | 1258391875.14849.4536.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:31 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> Ah, but the thing is, what was proposed wasn't "totally evilly
> draconian."
>
> There's a difference between:
>
> "You haven't reviewed any patches - we'll ignore you forever!"
>
> and
>
> "Since you haven't reviewed any patches, we are compelled to defer your
> patches until the next CommitFest."
>
> It's enough pain to make people think, but it's not *totally* punitive.
It is important to remember we are all volunteers here. Any increase to
the barrier of contribution is a bad one.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2009-11-16 17:38:03 | Re: What is the correct way to extract values from an int8 array in SPI? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-11-16 17:13:13 | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |