Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Date: 2009-11-15 18:57:55
Message-ID: 1258311475.14054.2422.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 20:30 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> The LSN doesn't help there, because when an itemid is marked as dead,
> the LSN is not updated.

I was thinking we could update the index block LSN without writing WAL
using the LSN of the heap block that leads to the killed tuple.
Pretending that the block might need flushing won't do much harm.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-11-15 18:58:05 Re: named parameters in SQL functions
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-11-15 18:54:00 Re: named parameters in SQL functions