Re: Syntax for partitioning

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date: 2009-10-29 22:19:42
Message-ID: 1256854782.10769.187.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 00:10 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2009-10-29 at 11:15 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> > Range partitioning:
> > CREATE TABLE table_name ( columns )
> > PARTITION BY RANGE ( a_expr )
> > (
> > PARTITION name VALUES LESS THAN [(] const [)],
> > PARTITION name VALUES LESS THAN [(] MAXVALUE [)] -- overflow partition
> > );
>
> Maybe this needs to mention the actual operator name instead of LESS
> THAN, in case the operator is not named < or the user wants to use a
> different one.

I can't help but wonder if the PERIOD type might be better for
representing a partition range. It would make it easier to express and
enforce the constraint that no two partition ranges overlap ;)

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-10-29 22:41:26 Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-10-29 22:10:57 Re: Syntax for partitioning