Re: Client application name

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-21 09:40:09
Message-ID: 1256118009.492.4211.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 10:19 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > ISTM much of the complexity discussed relates to this second feature.
> > Let's just concentrate on getting the connection-pool-identification
> > aspect of this done right and then maybe add second part later.
>
> That side of the patch works fine already (it's only a GUC after all),
> as does the during-connection option. The current problem is that old
> servers will barf if it's set in the startup packet.
>
> And yes, the stats part also works :-).

Then I say this feature is good to go. It's much needed. Well done.

Strip out the during-connection option for now. Let the startup packet
stuff come later, if ever.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-10-21 09:45:39 Re: Client application name
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-10-21 09:19:30 Re: Client application name