Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Could postgres be much cleaner if a future release skipped backward compatibility?
Date: 2009-10-20 05:43:20
Message-ID: 1256017400.9382.3.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 14:08 -0700, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > What are the probabilities that the OpenACSes of the world will just
> > set the value to "backward compatible" instead of touching their code?
>
> Would postgres get considerably cleaner if a hypothetical 9.0 release
> skipped backward compatibility and removed anything that's only
> maintained for historical reasons?

Probably not. Most of the examples you cite of documented deprecated or
historical behavior would be one-line changes to get rid of.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-10-20 05:58:58 Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-10-20 05:41:11 UTF8 with BOM support in psql