Re: Rejecting weak passwords

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, mlortiz <mlortiz(at)uci(dot)cu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date: 2009-10-14 22:12:50
Message-ID: 1255558370.22713.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If psql or pgAdmin takes a password and
> then sends it in the clear without telling me, that's a breach of
> trust
> with potentially serious consequences. I might not trust the DBA, for
> example, or I might be less confident of the network infrastructure
> than he is.

Well, you would lose anyway if the DBA switches the pg_hba.conf setting
from md5 to password without telling you. There is usually no
straightforward way in client applications to guard against that.
Something to think about.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-14 22:16:46 Re: Triggers on columns
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-10-14 22:07:45 Re: Rejecting weak passwords