Re: Hot Standby on git

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby on git
Date: 2009-10-02 08:07:54
Message-ID: 1254470874.17864.309.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 10:43 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> It seems dangerous to write a WAL record after the shutdown checkpoint.
> It will be overwritten by subsequent startup, which is a recipe for trouble.

I've said its a corner case and not worth spending time on. I'm putting
it in at your request. If it's not correct before and not correct after,
where exactly do you want it?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-10-02 08:26:18 Re: Hot Standby on git
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-10-02 07:55:14 Re: Hot Standby on git