| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Something smells in this schema... |
| Date: | 2001-02-16 18:02:24 |
| Message-ID: | 12540.982346544@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> writes:
> I had postgres start blocking all it's UPDATEs on a production
> database today, when an engineer added the following two tables,
> among other things. We've had to restore from backup, and the
> interesting thing is that when we re-add these tables, things
> break again.
"blocking"? Please define symptoms more precisely.
> My first thought was the index on the boolean field in the time_cards,
> which I could have sworn has caused me problems before. Anyone else see
> anything wrong?
Pre-7.1 versions do have problems with large numbers of equal keys in
a btree index, which is more or less the definition of an index on
boolean. I'm dubious that such an index is of any value anyway ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Haberlach | 2001-02-16 18:14:34 | Re: Something smells in this schema... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-16 17:47:26 | Re: Quick question about 7.1 & SQL92 Entry Level |