Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]
Date: 2009-09-20 17:19:35
Message-ID: 1253467175.6983.33.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 13:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> You're right, it still seems remarkably marginal. I'm rethinking
> my position on use of CONSTRAINT syntax because of the deferrability
> issue, but I'm still unconvinced that we need to allow the constraints
> to be decoupled from the indexes.

Ok, should I explicitly disallow multiple constraints on one index then?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-20 17:28:38 Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-20 17:16:08 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints